<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for fireverse.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fireverse.org/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fireverse.org</link>
	<description>beware of security guys with pro wrestler names</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Renaming Global Objects in Provider-1 by 2012 CPX Review &#124; DreezSecurityBlog</title>
		<link>http://fireverse.org/?p=144&#038;cpage=1#comment-11572</link>
		<dc:creator>2012 CPX Review &#124; DreezSecurityBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fireverse.org/?p=144#comment-11572</guid>
		<description>[...] http://fireverse.org/?p=144 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://fireverse.org/?p=144" rel="nofollow">http://fireverse.org/?p=144</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Passed the R70 CCMSE Exam by Rob</title>
		<link>http://fireverse.org/?p=628&#038;cpage=1#comment-10574</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fireverse.org/?p=628#comment-10574</guid>
		<description>Thanks for info and offer.
Decided to go down the Admin guide route and seem to be doing ok so far focusing on the R71 version. Exam booked for two weeks so fingers crossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for info and offer.<br />
Decided to go down the Admin guide route and seem to be doing ok so far focusing on the R71 version. Exam booked for two weeks so fingers crossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Passed the R70 CCMSE Exam by fireverse</title>
		<link>http://fireverse.org/?p=628&#038;cpage=1#comment-10532</link>
		<dc:creator>fireverse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fireverse.org/?p=628#comment-10532</guid>
		<description>You can save yourself the $500 by just studying the Administration guide, but you will have a lot of info to wade through. The nice thing about the official course ware is that it gave you an idea of what areas to hone in on, as well as a bunch of sample questions. I have an unopened copy for $300 USD if you are interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can save yourself the $500 by just studying the Administration guide, but you will have a lot of info to wade through. The nice thing about the official course ware is that it gave you an idea of what areas to hone in on, as well as a bunch of sample questions. I have an unopened copy for $300 USD if you are interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Passed the R70 CCMSE Exam by Rob</title>
		<link>http://fireverse.org/?p=628&#038;cpage=1#comment-10512</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fireverse.org/?p=628#comment-10512</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Is there any benefit in getting the Study guide for this or is prior knowledge and the admin guide enough? Just expensive if not really much use!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Is there any benefit in getting the Study guide for this or is prior knowledge and the admin guide enough? Just expensive if not really much use!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Provider-1 R75 Upgrade Walkthrough Video by fireverse</title>
		<link>http://fireverse.org/?p=639&#038;cpage=1#comment-8266</link>
		<dc:creator>fireverse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fireverse.org/?p=639#comment-8266</guid>
		<description>Look for an email from me....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look for an email from me&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Provider-1 R75 Upgrade Walkthrough Video by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://fireverse.org/?p=639&#038;cpage=1#comment-8177</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fireverse.org/?p=639#comment-8177</guid>
		<description>Hi! fireverse, Can you help me with a problem, I try migrate a Security Management (R75.20) to Provider-1 (R75.20), but I can&#039;t upgrade the policies on Provider-1, I tried with differents commands, cma_migrate, migrate export, etc... unsuccessfully

Can you tell me how i can to do it?

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! fireverse, Can you help me with a problem, I try migrate a Security Management (R75.20) to Provider-1 (R75.20), but I can&#8217;t upgrade the policies on Provider-1, I tried with differents commands, cma_migrate, migrate export, etc&#8230; unsuccessfully</p>
<p>Can you tell me how i can to do it?</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Provider-1 R75 Upgrade Walkthrough Video by fireverse</title>
		<link>http://fireverse.org/?p=639&#038;cpage=1#comment-8139</link>
		<dc:creator>fireverse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fireverse.org/?p=639#comment-8139</guid>
		<description>@Akos_Beginner

Great question. Yes it is normal. There are several different ways and tools for performing an upgrade. The R71 and R75 CDs come with an upgrade utility that is on the CD itself in the &#039;linux&#039; directory, and this is invoked through &quot;mds_setup.&quot; I am guessing you used this tool for your upgrade, and it is probably one of the easier paths to take. My reason for posting this video was to address the size issue of R75 and how it can only fit on a DVD. There are a lot of open platform gateways in production that still only have CDROM drives, so this might make mounting the .iso image locally a necessity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Akos_Beginner</p>
<p>Great question. Yes it is normal. There are several different ways and tools for performing an upgrade. The R71 and R75 CDs come with an upgrade utility that is on the CD itself in the &#8216;linux&#8217; directory, and this is invoked through &#8220;mds_setup.&#8221; I am guessing you used this tool for your upgrade, and it is probably one of the easier paths to take. My reason for posting this video was to address the size issue of R75 and how it can only fit on a DVD. There are a lot of open platform gateways in production that still only have CDROM drives, so this might make mounting the .iso image locally a necessity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Provider-1 R75 Upgrade Walkthrough Video by Akos_Beginner</title>
		<link>http://fireverse.org/?p=639&#038;cpage=1#comment-7691</link>
		<dc:creator>Akos_Beginner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fireverse.org/?p=639#comment-7691</guid>
		<description>I just did an upgrade from R70.40 to R75 and at OS version I see is R70. I used mds_setup instead of patch add cd.
Is it normal?

# cpstat os

Product Name:                  SVN Foundation
SVN Foundation Version String: R75
SVN Foundation Build Number:   979000247
SVN Foundation Status:         OK
OS Name:                       SecurePlatform Pro
OS Major Version:              -
OS Minor Version:              -
OS Build Number:               -
OS SP Major:                   -
OS SP Minor:                   -
OS Version Level:              R70 R70</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just did an upgrade from R70.40 to R75 and at OS version I see is R70. I used mds_setup instead of patch add cd.<br />
Is it normal?</p>
<p># cpstat os</p>
<p>Product Name:                  SVN Foundation<br />
SVN Foundation Version String: R75<br />
SVN Foundation Build Number:   979000247<br />
SVN Foundation Status:         OK<br />
OS Name:                       SecurePlatform Pro<br />
OS Major Version:              -<br />
OS Minor Version:              -<br />
OS Build Number:               -<br />
OS SP Major:                   -<br />
OS SP Minor:                   -<br />
OS Version Level:              R70 R70</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Passed the CCMSE+VSX Exam by fireverse</title>
		<link>http://fireverse.org/?p=747&#038;cpage=1#comment-7245</link>
		<dc:creator>fireverse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fireverse.org/?p=747#comment-7245</guid>
		<description>Yes, as of right now you still need to pass the CCSA and CCSE in order to qualify to take the CCMSE exam. Check Point is restructuring their certifications, so we will see if this changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as of right now you still need to pass the CCSA and CCSE in order to qualify to take the CCMSE exam. Check Point is restructuring their certifications, so we will see if this changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Passed the CCMSE+VSX Exam by George</title>
		<link>http://fireverse.org/?p=747&#038;cpage=1#comment-7215</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fireverse.org/?p=747#comment-7215</guid>
		<description>do you need CCSE for this exam as a pre-requisite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you need CCSE for this exam as a pre-requisite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

